11/29/ · The Rogerian Method of Argumentation is a conflict-resolution technique that you can use to build common ground while still stating your position. It’s a less aggressive form of argumentation than, say, the Toulmin method or 5-paragraph essay, where a claim is made with little regard to the feelings of someone who opposes your view 8/20/ · Rogerian therapy, created by Carl Rogers, is a therapeutic technique in which the client takes an active, autonomous role in therapy sessions. It is based on the idea that the client knows what is best, and that the therapist’s role is to facilitate an environment in which the client can bring about positive change To write the Rogerian argument format, it’s important to stick to this outline while you are writing: blogger.comuction: Stating the problem Explaining positive points of the mentioned position Indicating how a position is blogger.com points of opposing positions: Defining the main reasons why opponents
Rogerian Argument Essay: Example, Topics, Outline
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals.
For example, if you wanted to watch a comedy and your friend wanted to watch a romance, you might compromise by offering to watch a rom-com, as this offers each of you a bit of what you are looking for in that particular moment. Note, however, that this style of argument is decidedly less common in academic settings, where various rogerian format or theoretical notions of truth are often prized rogerian format the practical advantages of the Rogerian method.
While Aristotelian styles of argument are often seen as eristic concerned primarily with winningthe Rogerian argument can be viewed as more dialectic in nature a conversation between two or more parties with the goal of arriving at some mutually-satisfying solution. Thus, practicing the Rogerian argument will enhance your ability to understand the complex relations of opposing viewpoints and provide tools for addressing such discrepancies sympathetically.
However, rogerian format, Rogerian argument does come with disadvantages. For example, because Rogerian argument relies on compromise between opposing parties, it may not work well when your opponents are unwilling or unable to compromise, or if rogerian format are arguing in bad faith e.
The first aim shows the reader that you understand the complexities of the argument and that you have listened sympathetically to what it is they have to say. This is important, because the success of the Rogerian arguments relies on cooperation and collaboration.
The second aim puts this understanding into practice rogerian format seeking a symbiotic solution. The third aim builds ethos and rapport between the parties, rogerian format. If audiences believe they share a rogerian format system with a speaker or writer, rogerian format, they are more likely to agree to the rogerian format of whatever solution is presented, rogerian format. While each of these aims is important, Young, Becker, and Pike stress that they are just that: aims, not steps, rogerian format.
You should not necessarily view these aims as occurring in a linear, step-by-step process, rogerian format. The authors present a synthesized discussion of what a successful Rogerian argument should contain, rogerian format, but they eschew any formalized structure.
The structure of the argument should instead be determined by the speaker, and it should be modified and adapted according to the rhetorical situation at hand. Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument.
In this example, we will take the position that technology e. In so doing, we should be able to arrive at rogerian format solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving rogerian format goal of allowing technology in the classroom. Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, and discuss the implications closely considering all perspectives to arrive at a solution that works for everyone.
Here, rogerian format, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom. Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument.
We want to show that we are fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will give similar value to our opinions. We could include statistics, rogerian format, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction.
Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom. We would still want to speak as objectively as possible in order to establish our ethos as concerned but unbiased speaker. We might even qualify our position by acknowledging that there are, of course, situations in which technology should be put away, but reiterate that, generally speaking, the presence of digital technology is a positive.
For example, rogerian format, rogerian format could gather testimony from students who claim that using these technologies in class has been beneficial. We could include research and scholarship that supports our position and even quote instructors who have developed pedagogy around these technologies, rogerian format. We might even subtly demonstrate that our opposition has failed to account for all possibilities by choosing our examples carefully.
For instance, we could easily include accounts of students with learning disabilities who might otherwise have a difficult time succeeding in class without the help of assistive technologies, rogerian format. We would acknowledge that some instructors do not want digital technologies present in the classroom, as they believe they distract from paying attention during lectures, rogerian format.
We would maintain, however, that these technologies can indeed be productive tools for learning—in some cases, they can even be a virtual requirement for learning, rogerian format. We could then offer a solution: that these digital technologies should be kept aside during lecture portions of a lesson except in the case of students with documented disabilities. This way, rogerian format, students will likely be paying attention, taking notes by hand which they can transcribe later if they so wish.
However, rogerian format, once a class moves from lecture to activity whether group or individualstudents should be allowed to access these technologies to more effectively engage with the activity, organize their thoughts, and access information. Now that the instructor is no longer lecturing, it should be easier rogerian format monitor student progress and engagement and the use of technology for these activities will lead to more developed and better organized results from the students, rogerian format.
Find Info For Find Info For Academics Admissions Current Students Athletics About Careers Prospective Students Research and Partnerships Quick Links Apply News President Shop Visit Give Emergency.
Purdue Online Writing Lab College of Liberal Arts. Writing Lab Purdue OWL Research Contact Site Map. General Writing Academic Writing Rogerian format Perspectives on Argumentation. Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. Rogerian Argument The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals.
Contents Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument. Introduction Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. Opposing position Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not rogerian format allowed in the writing classroom.
Context for opposing position Rogerian format we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. Rogerian format Position Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom.
English Class: ROGERIAN ARGUMENT (How to Write a Rogerian Essay )
, time: 12:58How To Write A Rogerian Essay, with Outline
A Rogerian essay is meant to help students understand issues from two different perspectives to come up with an agreeable solution. According to Carl Roger’s effort in describing human traits, a Rogerian essay is based on the assumption that the writer needs to acknowledge other varied views by enabling readers to see some valid points about an opposing view 8/20/ · Rogerian therapy, created by Carl Rogers, is a therapeutic technique in which the client takes an active, autonomous role in therapy sessions. It is based on the idea that the client knows what is best, and that the therapist’s role is to facilitate an environment in which the client can bring about positive change A Rogerian essay presents a contentious topic using an impartial language to establish common ground and arrive at an agreement. A student identifies a problem from diverse perspectives and comes up with a suitable solution. With a Rogerian argument essay, one can be able to conciliate a tense and conflicting situation
No comments:
Post a Comment